[Tagging] Source tag - deprecated for use on objects?

[Jo]

2013/1/3 Georg Feddern <osm at bavarianmallet.de>

> Am 02.01.2013 18:16, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>  +1, the smaller (and more sorted by kind of change action) changesets
>> get, the better the chance that the following mapping will understand
>> easily what it is about. There is really no point in grouping
>> different kinds of edits in the same set of changes, just because you
>> happen to do them at the same time.
>>
>
> Sometimes I see e.g. a restaurant just by driving by.
>
> Mapping at home
> - I draw a building outline from Bing
> - add amenity and name from survey
> - add address info from internet research (depending on my own memory)
>
> And you really think I will add that in 3 (three!) different changesets?
>

Same here. I start editing from survey, then notice some stuf is misaligned
or missing on Bing. I try to minimize the impact on the history of the
objects by creating larger changesets, but of course, this means several
sources are used and mixed in one changeset. In fact I stopped adding
sources. It's true that it doesn't make a lot of sense to clog the objects
with them, but when uploading, I always tend to forget to mention it on the
changeset anyway.

Jo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130103/4db8e64c/attachment.html>