[Tagging] Giant river multipolygons

Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 29 10:42:36 GMT 2013

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> My opinion is your opinion: if there is no good reason for gigantic areas, don't use them.
> +1,

We already have "gigantic areas" for USA, Russia, India, China...
So just explain me why what you accept for administrative boundaries
is suddenly not good for rivers....
Btw, I never edited waterway relations myself but huge admin boundaries, yes ;-)


More information about the Tagging mailing list