[Tagging] Giant river multipolygons

[Malcolm Herring]

On 29/01/2013 10:42, Pieren wrote:
> So just explain me why what you accept for administrative boundaries
> is suddenly not good for rivers....

It is the relation type that is at issue. The problems arise when the 
relation type is a multipolygon with all the outers & inners of the 
entire river as members rather than a separate relation (e.g., 
type=waterway) with all the riverbank multipolygons as members.