[Tagging] Open of discussion on "operational_status" (part of life cycle with disused/abandoned/demolished)

Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com
Tue Jul 2 08:21:53 UTC 2013

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> A telephone that is already tagged as functional would not normally be
> re-tagged as functional just to say "yes, it still is". This means that the
> "operational_status:date" tag is superfluous, since it will always be the
> date of the changeset when the operational_status was last modified.

But much easier for a data consumer to access, than attempting to
apply the heuristic you suggest (processing changesets one by one
until you find the latest one in which that tag was changed).


More information about the Tagging mailing list