[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bakery,confectionery

Murry McEntire murry.mcentire at gmail.com
Fri Jul 5 17:18:59 UTC 2013

The proposal talk page has been rather inactive, a bit more discussion
happening on the mailing list. I would like comment on the Additional tags
section of the talk page where tags such as
site_produced=yes/all/most/some/few/no, outlet=yes/commercial/local/no,
artisan=yes/all/most/some/few/no are looked at as possible tags.
Some of the other discussion makes me lean toward a mixed and baked on site
for the site_produced tag with an understanding the artisan tag is the made
from scratch indicator; but would like feedback and perhaps other ways made
from scratch, mixed on site, baked on site, finish baked on site, etc.
should be distinguished.

After looking at an artisan tag for bakery, I'm wondering if I should use
just two confectionery types of sweets and chocolates (dropping
artisan_sweets) and adding an additional artisan tag to that page (with a
slightly changed definition to drop the bakery specific examples)?

On the main page of the proposal, I have updated the proposed new article
pages with the right-side sidebar in common use on other pages.


On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Murry McEntire <murry.mcentire at gmail.com>wrote:

> A proposal for improving the current misleading definitions and misuse of
> bakeries and confectioneries and adding tags for the types of goods
> sold.is now ready for additional comment.
> This is a revised version of a proposal that was strongly voted down. The
> split of bakery shop types is gone, the "diet:" version of some tags is now
> used, and some additional cleanup was done.
> The link to the (revised) proposal page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal/Shop%3Dbakery,confectionery
> I'm be opening this for voting in a few days since this is a reopening of
> the commenting period started June 11th. I am interpreting  the first vote
> as comment for a strong revision of the proposal. A link to the previous
> proposal version can be found on the talk page (comments tab).
> Thank you to those who participated in the discussion for shaping and
> adding ideas to  the proposal. Thank you voters on the first version, it's
> good to see interested participation.
> Murry (user CS Mur)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130705/c9066078/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list