[Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Sun Jul 7 16:47:03 UTC 2013

Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
> Hey
> Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
> broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
> task for a bot.

Sorry, numbers are towards "leaved".

> On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=* and not
> tree_type=* or tree:type=* as type is the key for relations and it is
> not that good to use different meanings of one key.

Maybe tree=* would work, too.

I also spotted type=conifer and wood=coniferous. Would be better to use
the same value for both.


More information about the Tagging mailing list