[Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

[Tobias Knerr]

On 07.07.2013 18:47, fly wrote:
> Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
>> Hey
>>
>> Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
>> broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
>> task for a bot.
> 
> Sorry, numbers are towards "leaved".

Numbers are not necessarily meaningful due to imports. There were
several, for example the Girona import using "leafed" ...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5007703
... and the Vienna import using "leaved":
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14113662

That being said, I'm also very interested in learning the "right"
spelling so we can resolve this issue.

>> On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=* and not
>> tree_type=* or tree:type=* as type is the key for relations and it is
>> not that good to use different meanings of one key.

+1

Tobias