[Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

John Sturdy jcg.sturdy at gmail.com
Sun Jul 7 16:59:28 UTC 2013

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
> > Hey
> >
> > Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
> > broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
> > task for a bot.
> Sorry, numbers are towards "leaved".
> > On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=* and not
> > tree_type=* or tree:type=* as type is the key for relations and it is
> > not that good to use different meanings of one key.

On further thought, I'd go for type=deciduous, rather than
broad-lea[fv]ed.  Not quite the same thing (I think larches are deciduous
but not broad-leaved) but I think it's the normal "technical" term (the
others being "evergreen").

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130707/2f201fbb/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list