[Tagging] foot=yes or bicycle=yes on track without other limitations?

Elliott Plack elliott.plack at gmail.com
Wed Jul 10 13:46:40 UTC 2013


Maarten,

I know there is some controversy (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_controversy) over the tagging of
paths, so perhaps adding those tags would be for clarification, in case the
user interprets the footway in some other way.

Elliott


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Maarten Deen <mdeen at xs4all.nl> wrote:

> Is there a deeper meaning of adding foot=yes or bicycle=yes to
> highway=track or highway=path without adding other limitations? I thought
> track and path are by default routable for foot and bicycle, so IMHO they
> add nothing.
>
> Examples:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/53561813<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53561813>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/68796031<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/68796031>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/195440134<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/195440134>
>
> Regards,
> Maarten
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>



-- 
Elliott Plack
http://about.me/elliottp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130710/d1f24b6d/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list