[Tagging] Bridleway/hiking trail/bike track tags

fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Thu Jul 11 21:26:21 UTC 2013


Am 11.07.2013 23:02, schrieb fly:
> Am 11.07.2013 22:55, schrieb Masi Master:
>> Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com>:
>>
>>> Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
>>>>  I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
>>>> use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails.  What
>>>> tagging scheme would be appropriate for these trails?
>>>
>>> I stopped using *ways as values and only use path with
>>> bicycle/foot/horse=(official/)designated/yes/no.
>>
>> I think, it is nice to see for who the trail is made for! So I would
>> prefer bridleway & cycleway etc. (A minor problem is the
>> high-ranking/strict default-value (i mean "designated"), better it is
>> only *=yes)

You can not often tell for who the ways are mode for. Many are multiuse
, some change over the seasons and it always needs on personal
conditions and abilities.


> +1
> You I right I missed that. Especially considering trails or pathes in
> the wilderness.

Sorry whole block above was the comment to sentence below !!!


>> You propose access-tags, but i think they only should used if there is a
>> access-sign or symbol!?
>>
>>> everything else goes to extra tags:
>>>
>>> mtb:scale=*
>>> sac_scale=*
>>> uiaa_scale=*
>>> smoothness=*
>>> surface=*
>>> width=*
>>> barrier=*
>>> obstacle=*
>>
>> using extra tags is verry good!
> 




More information about the Tagging mailing list