[Tagging] Bridleway/hiking trail/bike track tags

fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Thu Jul 11 21:02:44 UTC 2013

Am 11.07.2013 22:55, schrieb Masi Master:
> Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com>:
>> Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown:
>>>  I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple
>>> use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails.  What
>>> tagging scheme would be appropriate for these trails?
>> I stopped using *ways as values and only use path with
>> bicycle/foot/horse=(official/)designated/yes/no.
> I think, it is nice to see for who the trail is made for! So I would
> prefer bridleway & cycleway etc. (A minor problem is the
> high-ranking/strict default-value (i mean "designated"), better it is
> only *=yes)

You I right I missed that. Especially considering trails or pathes in
the wilderness.

> You propose access-tags, but i think they only should used if there is a
> access-sign or symbol!?
>> everything else goes to extra tags:
>> mtb:scale=*
>> sac_scale=*
>> uiaa_scale=*
>> smoothness=*
>> surface=*
>> width=*
>> barrier=*
>> obstacle=*
> using extra tags is verry good!

More information about the Tagging mailing list