[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting Open - toilets, toilets:disposal, pitlatrine

[Bryce Nesbitt]

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> access=permissive (while nominally private, no visible attempt is made
> >> to restrict access, and casual use appears to be tolerated by the
> >> owners).
> >> access=inquiry (an inquiry must be made for access, for example to
> >> receive a key).
> >> access=customers (the explicit policy is to require a purchase of some
> >> sort prior to use of the facilities. Non-customers should expect a
> >> risk they would be blocked from the facility.).
> >
> > Thank you Bryce,
> > +1, this looks like a quite exhaustive list, I'd suggest you add this to
> the proposal, as it seems to be very useful
>

Something could be both  inquiry and customer.  Is there a better way?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130719/1b2e830c/attachment.html>