[Tagging] Underground power lines in tunnel

[François Lacombe]

Martin, John,

Can't we get the type=tunnel or type=bridge proposal voted and accepted ?

It need a little clean up and example of different kind but it seems to be
a good way to map tunnel and bridges.
Finally asking for comments and vote it is the best way to be sure of it.


Fly,

Tunnel and bridges may be complex structures which sometimes aren't built
in a single piece.
Relation is needed here to link all pieces to each other in one hand and on
the other to link the whole structure to its direct environment.

I'm not convinced into in mapping all bridges or tunnels spatially is the
best way, according to what I explained before.


Cheers.


*François Lacombe*

francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
http://www.infos-reseaux.com


2013/6/5 fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com>

> Am 05.06.2013 00:11, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> > On 04/giu/2013, at 08:54, Peter Wendorff <wendorff at uni-paderborn.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> A motorway with two separate highways in OSM may be one bridge
> >> alltogether - but is mapped as two.
> >
> >
> > actually we usually don't map bridges or tunnels, there is only the
> indirect mapping with an attribute on the road that says: this street is on
> a bridge, eventually there is also a bridge_name that tells on which
> bridge, but still an actual bridge (or tunnel) object isn't mapped usually.
>
> Yes, I do and others as well:
>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-January/012795.html
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=bridge
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=bridge
>
> man_made=tunnel does also work.
>
> fly
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130605/61d648bc/attachment.html>