[Tagging] Photo links in OSM

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Wed Jun 12 13:35:15 UTC 2013


On 6/12/13 9:28 AM, Zecke wrote:
> Am 12.06.2013 14:36, schrieb Richard Welty:
>> i'm not at all enthusiastic about having a variable value like that
>> as a key
> Well, I understand your concern. I would much prefer a lifecycle 
> relation or even a data model supporting key-value lists as a valid 
> value.
>
> I also see much resistance to historic data in OSM (not only here, 
> also in forum discussions - it's not at all my opinion). What I do not 
> understand is, why is 3D widely accepted? It even relies on a wiki 
> page, referred to as "4D"!!!
> ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OSM-4D ). So, historic data 
> should have the same acceptance as 3D objects.
>
> As far as I see, image:present and image:ancient do not induce the 
> same opposition as image:date? I could live with that.
>
i think we should be looking to OHM as a repository for historic data.

richard





More information about the Tagging mailing list