[Tagging] Proposed relation give_way

[fly]

On 14.03.2013 17:01, Jo wrote:
> 2013/3/14 Simone Saviolo <simone.saviolo at gmail.com
> <mailto:simone.saviolo at gmail.com>>
> 
>     2013/3/14 Steve Doerr <doerr.stephen at gmail.com
>     <mailto:doerr.stephen at gmail.com>>

>     I think the two ways may coexist: the node method being easier on
>     the mappers, and the relation being easier on the consumers.
> 
> 
> Maybe I should have a look at the proposal first, but wouldn't you have
> give_way or stop node anyway? If it is near to an intersection, why
> would it be hard on consumers to deal with it?
> 
> I think you'd only need a relation if the directionality isn't what one
> would normally expect, i.e. you enter the street from the intersection
> and then you are supposed to give way, maybe to a cycleway or a
> crossing. Although even that is normal. Because traffic that makes a
> turn has to yield for traffic traveling straight on.

Funny, I was thinking about who to add a give_way to node which is
already tagged with traffic_lights just a few days ago. I know quite a
couple of them.

cheers
fly