[Tagging] Juice "restaurants"

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed May 8 12:35:19 UTC 2013

2013/5/8 Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>

> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com>wrote:
>> I agree with specifically tagging them as juice bars (amenity=juice_bar).
>> They also don't all qualify as cafes, since they don't all offer
>> seating, for example, if they're in a food court, or just a street
>> vendor with no seating.
> Going by your logic, then Starbucks should not be tagged as amenity=cafe
> as well since there are also Starbucks outlets that don't provide seats.

+1, if it is a takeaway Starbuck without seating it shouldn't be tagged
amenity=cafe, but you shouldn't deduct from this that all Starbucks
shouldn't be tagged as amenity=cafe, but rather that not all Starbucks will
be tagged the same way.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130508/80aa3175/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list