[Tagging] Recreation_ground (landuse vs leisure)

Rovastar rovastar at hotmail.com
Mon May 27 13:52:11 UTC 2013

I was going to enter a long rambling rant about this subject against the
anti-"mechanical edits" gang (part of the anti-import and anti-aerial
imagery groups)....it seems like some of them just like bad data and no

But a simple +1 to Tobias' comments. Crazy guidelines in the Mechanical Edit
Policy wiki. If everyone followed them no-one would ever edit a typo at all
(maybe that is the plan...)

I would also say the biggest issue I see here for the subject of
Recreation_ground (landuse vs leisure) is that the editors have different
standards. Surely we should be addressing that and getting the editors to
have consistent standards for this. 

View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Recreation-ground-landuse-vs-leisure-tp5762723p5762891.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Tagging mailing list