[Tagging] tag proposal for soft play centres

Dominic Hosler dominichosler at gmail.com
Wed Nov 6 14:31:06 UTC 2013

I like that idea Martin, I've added a link to the playground tag for
tagging individual pieces of equipment (if anyone feels the need to).

Should I just start the voting by putting today's date, or do you
think it should be left for more comments first?


On 5 November 2013 14:57, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/11/5 Erik Johansson <erjohan at gmail.com>
>> I think it's not such a good idea to use leisure=playground + fee=yes,
>> since it most certainly is not a playground, but sure playgrounds
>> really do span a very big range from a sandbox to extremely large
>> contraptions .
> +1, I think his current proposal leisure=indoor_play is fine, I'd encourage
> mappers to add explicitly "fee"=yes/no/amount because otherwise (if fee is
> implied) we would have to invent another tag for those places that are
> non-commercial or offer this kind of service as included in the general
> entrance fee to a bigger place.
>> It would be interesting to tag "place where kids can play", many
>> museums/science centers have that as well.
> IMHO the same tag could be used.
> I'd also add a link from the current proposal to this page:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground because the tagging of
> the equipment could be the same than for leisure=playground where possible.
> CHeers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

More information about the Tagging mailing list