[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Gambling

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Mon Nov 11 18:02:46 UTC 2013


On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 17:50 +0100, fly wrote:
> On 10.11.2013 23:28, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> > On 3 November 2013 15:58, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> I wonder if we should not use leisure in general and try to avoid
> >> amenity. At least for new tags and tags with low numbers leisure=*
> >> should be used.
> > 
> > I agree, I will move amusement_arcade to the leisure key.
> > 
> > However, I will leave casino in the amenity key, as moving it to the
> > leisure key seems too much trouble (mainly for data consumers) for too
> > little gain.
> 
> Do not think that video_arcade and amusement_arcade need to be the same.
> For me, video sound more like a place to play video games and not about
> gambling.
> 
> I would like to distinguish between these arcades.
> 
> What I miss so far is a way to better describe what kind of gambling is
> possible, no weather what kind of place it is, similar to gambling=*
> 
> Do we need a tag for each machines ?
> How do I tag a bar with some machines ? a backdoor room ?
> 
I would agree here, playing for pleasure does need to be distinguished
from gambling. Gambling will imply age restrictions on entry, whereas
playing video games does not.

When I was growing up the age limit was not enforced, but it is now. It
has been a long time since I have been into an arcade, but I would
imagine they have been divided in some way so as not to restrict the
whole premises to the legal gambling age. Anybody like to comment?

An age limit tag will also be useful, it is not helpful to tag video
games, if the age of entry is restricted to gambling age people.

Phil (trigpoint)




More information about the Tagging mailing list