[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - bicycle=use_cycleway
masi-master at gmx.de
Tue Nov 12 23:46:18 UTC 2013
I'm the co-author of this proposal.
There are a difference about bicycle-forbidden and a compulsory cycleway.
At a "bicycle forbidden" section cycling is not allowed ever.
At a road with a compulsory cycleway, it is allowed to cycle on the road,
if the cycleway is not passable, reachable or some other exceptions.
With bicycle=no the secondary is not reachable. With bicycle=use_cycleway
a router can give those roads a lower factor.
In Germany it is allowed to leave the cycleway for a leftturn, if you
choose the normal leftturn-lane (which cars use). Or in Austria training
with a racebike is allowed to don't look after compulsory cycleway. I.e.
for the last case the router can give you an option to allow
We can't wait until all router add this tag, because they would say: "we
pay heed to this tag, because is not common.
Am 12.11.2013, 19:29 Uhr, schrieb Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com>:
> Pee Wee
> A couple of questions.
> How does this improve mapping/routing over using bicycle=no?
> How does your proposal distinguish the exceptions to the rule that you
> gave as an example below?
> Dave F.
> On 12/11/2013 18:16, Pee Wee wrote:
>> Legallythese 2 roads are not the same. For example.. in NL some 3
>> wheelbicycles with certain measurements are allowed to ride the second
>> type of road.In other countries there is also a legal difference. For
>> this reason we propose this new tag.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging