[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - bicycle=use_cycleway

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Nov 15 16:28:09 UTC 2013


2013/11/15 Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>

> Then you really want bicycle=destination and this whole "use_cycleway"
> crud is redundant if you've mapped the cycleway correctly.  I see no
> compelling argument to change the world when access=destination already
> exists for exactly this situation.




If you go back in this thread you'll see that "destination" is only one of
several possibilities for making the cycleway not compulsory any more to
the cyclist.
I think there is a misconception regarding "changing the world", this is
nothing you'll have to tag or bother with if you live in an area without
compulsory cycleways, so it really doesn't affect you at all. This is about
tagging a certain property to a road (this road has a compulsory cycleway
associated with it) in certain jurisdictions (e.g. NL, DE), where it does
matter.

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131115/c7794fd5/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list