[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - bicycle=use_cycleway

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Fri Nov 15 16:34:13 UTC 2013


On Friday, November 15, 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

>
> If you go back in this thread you'll see that "destination" is only one of
> several possibilities for making the cycleway not compulsory any more to
> the cyclist.
> I think there is a misconception regarding "changing the world", this is
> nothing you'll have to tag or bother with if you live in an area without
> compulsory cycleways, so it really doesn't affect you at all. This is about
> tagging a certain property to a road (this road has a compulsory cycleway
> associated with it) in certain jurisdictions (e.g. NL, DE), where it does
> matter.
>

I do live someplace where this is relevant, and I'm still not seeing how
the difference between the proposal and bicycle=destination isn't so subtle
as to render the distinction irrelevant.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131115/605953af/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list