[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=highway
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Fri Nov 29 15:07:06 UTC 2013
Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> writes:
> 2013/11/17> The definition given for the landuse-polygon seems too restrictive, I'd
> ditch the second part "are constructed up to a boundary or barrier
> separating this land from private property."
> (Because there doesn't have to be private property along a road, and
> neither there will always be boundaries or barriers).
In Massachusetts, there is essentially always a lot boundary adjacent to
a "highway" (which means a legal road). Sometimes those lots are owned
by the government. But there's a very clear notion of "being within
the the land allocated to the roadway" which is much wider than the
So I think landuse=highway does make sense and should be about some
blend of land ownership, lot lines, etc. I don't mean to say that
should be mandatory, but it's how it should be when it makes sense
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Tagging