[Tagging] Hiking route abandoned

[Fernando Trebien]

Wouldn't the more generic disused=yes apply to this case? Rendering apps
should support lifecycle tags and render them accordingly (though often
then don't and none would support this anyway).

I'd keep the route relation while the route is still open and somewhat
popular among hikers.
On Oct 1, 2013 2:57 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> 2013/10/1 SomeoneElse <lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk>
>
>> If something does exist, you might want to draw other mappers to its
>> "abandoned" status somehow.  Here's a route near me that's still partially
>> signed but not supported by the council (the organisation that created it)
>> on safety grounds
>>
>
>
> that's why I suggested the abandoned-prefixing (on talk-it) because he
> pointed out that many hiking guides will still have records for this route
> and my guess is that you'll also find one or the other trailblaze for a
> certain period of time, so it seemed like a compromise.
>
>
>
>>
>> Not that it particularly matters one way or the other.
>>
>
>
> +1
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131002/821febd7/attachment-0001.html>