[Tagging] Power tower and pole usefulness

François Lacombe francois.lacombe at telecom-bretagne.eu
Wed Oct 9 12:56:39 UTC 2013

Hi Bryce,

Did you mean you find the proposal a bit difficult to understand ?
Yes it is. Nevertheless, many of tagging is optional, I can edit the
document to show it in a more understandable way.

This proposal doesn't prevent mappers to map large overhead transmission
lines as landmark if they want to.
It describe a consistent tagging scheme to allow mappers who want to get
deeper in description.


*François Lacombe*

francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu

2013/10/9 Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>

> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, François Lacombe <
> francois.lacombe at telecom-bretagne.eu> wrote:
>> You can send me any formal and constructive suggestion about that.
>> Vote will begin shortly. Stay tuned.
> I've found the power proposal a bit much to follow...
> ... but have found it satisfying to map the simpler case of which street
> corridors have overhead vs. undergrounded wires ("utilities=underground").
> I hope the eventual power proposal continues to have a place for those of
> us who map larger transmission lines
> as landmarks, even if the electrical characteristics are unknown or
> unimportant to us.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20131009/1ad01bbb/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list