[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

[François Lacombe]

Ok, but 'yes' has to be added to the transformer=* table of values in the
proposal.
It isn't for now, that's why I thought we can't use it in this particular
case.

And what about multi-utilities poles ?
IMHO they definetly can't only be identified by power=* tag.


*François Lacombe*

francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
http://www.infos-reseaux.com


2013/9/2 Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>

> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:18 PM, François Lacombe
> <francois.lacombe at telecom-bretagne.eu> wrote:
>
> > Example :
> > power=pole
> > pole:transformer=yes
> > transformer=distribution
> > voltage=20000;400
> > transformer:ref=XXXXXX
> > pole:ref=YYYY
>
> Move "pole:transformer=yes" to one of the possible values of
> "transformer" and you fall back to the tag combination we suggested
> few weeks ago ;-)
> This is very common in OSM. 'yes' is the default value for the
> contributors who can see something but cannot say (or don't care
> about) the details (e.g. "building=yes")
>
> Pieren
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20130902/632ef2ba/attachment.html>