[Tagging] Proposal for new tag: landuse=plot
osm at raggedred.net
Wed Sep 18 17:33:33 UTC 2013
On 18/09/13 18:15, Lukas Hornby wrote:
> Having studied all of the comments, we seem to agree that a tag is
> needed, that it is worth tagging. However the ambiguity over plot
> (which was the word I used in my proposal and lot (which has been read
> into plot) seems to be a sticking point.
> I am moved to resubmit this proposal under the name
> allotments:allotment_garden. This seems to be as close to universal as
> can be achieved. Where the concept of allotments doesn't exist, then
> the tag is not useful in that region.
Why? Everyone who has an allotment would call the individual rented area
a 'plot' or their 'allotment', but never an allotment garden. An
allotment site is made of plots, probably with tracks or paths between
the plots and possibly with shared areas such as parking, a communal
store or shed and water tanks or taps.
> This also paves the way for another useful sub-divison of allotments,
> allotments:community_garden. A previous proposal was made here
> which made the same mistakes I did in using 'landuse' incorrectly.
> This tag would apply to allotment areas used by the community rather
> than the individual and is consistent with the concept of an allotment
> in the US.
> In terms of procedure, should I rename the proposal, or abandon it and
> start anew?
More information about the Tagging