[Tagging] Power tower and pole usefulness
francois.lacombe at telecom-bretagne.eu
Mon Sep 23 10:57:18 UTC 2013
I can't open voting right now since some other points are still incomplete
(RFC outlined comments and it's time to find a solution).
Moreover, substation refinement vote is currently opened, one thing at a
Be sure I'm willing to propose a good solution to the multiple power
instances on the same node.
But it's hard work to look wide and time is currently missing for me.
That's why it's not good to launch vote now too : proposal has 99% chances
to be rejected regarding this point and I don't want to recap my investment
Sorry but the "consistency thread" was too big to follow it correctly :(
francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu
2013/9/23 Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:38 PM, François Lacombe
> > Deprecating power=tower and power=pole was my first proposition.
> > Many people goes against it and then I refined the proposal.
> > For now I'm just introducing man_made=tower + tower:type=power to use it
> > when power=* is needed to describe hosted devices.
> > Thus, man_made=tower doesn't seem to be the perfect solution, so let's
> > to find it but the topic isn't to deprecate power=tower because it won't.
> François, another thread on this ML was opened about "consensus in
> OSM" and raised some inconsistencyies in our taging documentation. And
> now, you are creating a new inconsistency. You already got some advice
> about how to fix the "power" tag issue when you need the key more than
> once (use subtags). Please, open now a "vote" on your proposal to get
> some feedback from a larger audience and see if you are in the right
> direction or not.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging