[Tagging] simple_brunnel : one node bridge like xing highway over waterway

[Richard Welty]

On 4/4/14 5:51 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> Stop saying GPS. Forget even about aerial imagery. When I had no aerial
> imagery in my area, I either did not draw such features (leaving them for
> future improvements), or approximate. "The road there is about 6 meters
> wide, so I'll draw two nodes about 6 meters apart, split the waterway there
> and tag the middle piece as a culvert". It's not that hard, it's not that
> much imprecise, sure it may be improved with better measurements, but it is
> not wrong, especially it is not topologically wrong.
>
and if you are not sure about the extent of the structure or its nature
there's no harm in nipping out a short section, setting layer=1 and
skipping the other tagging (bridge=yes or whatever.) you have
accurately represented what you know and maintained correct
topology.

richard

-- 
rwelty at averillpark.net
 Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
 OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
 Java - Web Applications - Search


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 946 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140404/400c18fd/attachment.pgp>