[Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

Yves yvecai at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 16:10:57 UTC 2014


I guess the problem arises from tagging dead-ends in a geo database.
QA tools should keep there false positives for themself, not in OSM, don't you think?


On 10 avril 2014 16:59:44 UTC+02:00, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer
><florian at schaeferban.de> wrote:
>
>> True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
>> example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
>> All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes. The tagging on ways
>can't
>> cover all cases (deadends with more than one end) and causes problems
>for
>> example when splitting ways.
>
>I also explained why the mentionned examples are not a problem. I'm
>ready to change my opinion if I get valid arguments...
>
>> Therefore I'd recommend in the Wiki to use it always on nodes to
>avoid the
>> problems with way-tagging.
>
>But we don't have "problems" with the tag on the way ! It's true that
>the wiki has to document the best practices but it should not fordid
>practices that are not wrong, harmfull, unclear or ambiguous ! I
>regret the time when people worked with a more open mind in this
>project.
>
>Pieren
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140410/9cdbfabe/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list