[Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

[Volker Schmidt]

You mean the British legal definition of cycleway.

Just to ad another bit of legal aspects in this. In Italy, on ways signed
like like this
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:120px-Zeichen_240.svg.png, the
pedestran has priority over he cyclist.



On 18 August 2014 22:00, SomeoneElse <lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk> wrote:

> On 18/08/2014 20:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Another point was that ways with signs like this
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:120px-Zeichen_240.svg.png
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/a/aa/120px-Zeichen_241.svg.png
>> are neither cycleways nor footways, they are both at the same time
>> (especially the segregated=no version).
>>
>
> They _exactly_ fit the British English definition of a cycleway, actually
> (in fact, most places that I've been apart from Germany) - you can both
> walk and cycle on them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140818/1e78650e/attachment.html>