[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - nudism

phil at trigpoint.me.uk phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Tue Aug 19 11:01:48 UTC 2014


The usual english term applied to beaches is 'clothing optional'.

Phil (trigpoint)

On Tue Aug 19 2014 11:54:21 GMT+0100 (BST), Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 
> > Am 19.08.2014 09:37, schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> > 
> >>  
> >> Is it reasonable to define that it defaults to no? I am worried about another obvious tag (nudism=no) appearing everywhere.
> 
> 
> this is entirely dependent on the culture, but I agree that in the region I map nudism=no can safely be assumed to be the default. 
> 
> Maybe a more generic tag like dress_code would also catch these places? This was already proposed some time ago IIRR. Besides restaurants or beaches the dress code tag might also apply to other places, eg in Italy for most religious places you are expected to have your shoulders covered and shorts are often not allowed (eg monasteries and churches).
> 
> It could also be interesting sometimes if nudism is obligatory or clothing is admitted as well 
> 
> 
> cheers,
> Marti

-- 
Sent from my Jolla


More information about the Tagging mailing list