[Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission

[Lukas Sommer]

Maybe we could use a key with a namespace: “power:usage=*” or something
else. Keeping is separate from the railway usage could give us more
clairity.

Lukas Sommer

2014-11-24 15:24 GMT+00:00 François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>:

> Hi Rainer and thank you.
>
> I didn't spend time yet on the update done on the Pipeline proposal but be
> sure I will.
>
> What were the concern against network=* tag ?
> If they can be avoided with usage=* (or any common key) I'm ok to join you
> to use the same between power transmission and pipelines.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> *François Lacombe*
>
> fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com
> www.infos-reseaux.com
> @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux>
>
> 2014-11-24 15:57 GMT+01:00 Rainer Fügenstein <rfu at oudeis.org>:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> FL> I knew usage=* and it can be the ideal key to indicate
>> usage=transmission,
>> FL> usage=distribution,... on power lines or power cables.
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, this key is intended to serve  the same purpose
>> as the network=* key is in the pipeline proposal:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/PipelineExtension#Pipelines
>>
>> FL> But it is currently and exclusively used for railway tagging.
>> FL> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:usage
>>
>> concerns against using the network=* key have been raised. it would
>> make sense to join forces here and use a common key, be it usage=* or
>> something else.
>>
>> cu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141201/a4a3a502/attachment.html>