[Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Dec 2 10:17:28 UTC 2014


2014-12-02 8:04 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer <sommerluk at gmail.com>:

> I agree with you if you say that “usage” sounds like a very general key
> and not a railway specific key. So the railway guys have just been a little
> faster than the power guys and “occupied” this key.
>


although it would have been better also for a railway specific key to be
more explicit and have a namespace prefixed.



> I would accept this and search another key to avoid unnecessary conflicts.
> I don’t insist in “power:usage”. It can also be something else, but I would
> introduce a new key for this.
>


+1, we shouldn't copy "bad practise" from other special interest topics,
but try to make it better now and in the future.

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141202/af583db2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list