[Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 12:50:18 UTC 2014
2014-12-03 19:55 GMT+01:00 Michael Reichert <nakaner at gmx.net>:
> I do not know why anyone should tag one OSM way both with power=* and
> railway=*.
>
here are some examples:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167556124
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167556076
and some more ways:
12279208
102605934
102605956
102605964
102605870
102606010
12271449
102605932
102606020
20649231
20065378
159234583
159234590
20062789
159234589
20060234
117020356
20059936
87829940
haven't checked all, but they seem to be in majority ways tagged as
railway=abandoned. You might not know why people are doing this, but they
actually do it.
Here's 2 that aren't abandoned railways:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168659470
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299352641 (OK, this is a razed railway,
probably similar to abandoned).
cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141204/3999691d/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list