[Tagging] Adding values to usage=* key for power transmission

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 12:50:18 UTC 2014


2014-12-03 19:55 GMT+01:00 Michael Reichert <nakaner at gmx.net>:

> I do not know why anyone should tag one OSM way both with power=* and
> railway=*.
>


here are some examples:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167556124
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167556076
and some more ways:
  12279208
 102605934
 102605956
 102605964
 102605870
 102606010
  12271449
 102605932
 102606020
  20649231
  20065378
 159234583
 159234590
  20062789
 159234589
  20060234
 117020356
  20059936
  87829940

haven't checked all, but they seem to be in majority ways tagged as
railway=abandoned. You might not know why people are doing this, but they
actually do it.
Here's 2 that aren't abandoned railways:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168659470
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299352641 (OK, this is a razed railway,
probably similar to abandoned).

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141204/3999691d/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list