[Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Dec 19 12:17:32 UTC 2014

2014-12-19 13:07 GMT+01:00 Никита <acroq3 at gmail.com>:
> leisure=playground (usually outdoor), kids_area (almost always indoor, esp
> in Russia during winter)

why can't we get rid of the exceptions ("usually", "almost always") and
state that one is outdoors, the other indoors (if standalone), or one is
standalone, the other is part of another feature like a shop.

> leisure=playground (poor equipment, often vandal resistant), kids_area
> (fragile or expensive equipment is not rare)

not convinced. "poor equipment" is not my experience for some places, this
is really depending on the actual place (overall but not only country, also
city and individual playground).

> leisure=playground (almost never fee=yes), kids_area (it will cost you
> directly fee=yes or indirectly fee=no via your prices
> in restaurant/cafe/pub/stadium)

"almost never"=sometimes and indirect fees via prices means you only pay if
you buy something (i.e. fee=no). -> Not helpful for distinction

> leisure=playground (provided by local municipality), kids_area often
> provided by commercial company (malls, private kindergartens, hotels)

you would then tag the exact same feature with different main tags, if the
operator is public or private?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141219/175bd2f1/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list