[Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2014-12-19 13:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>:
>
> I would prefer leisure=playground for standalone and kids_area=yes for an
> additional feature. This seems intuitive to me.



+1, I'd see it the same. We could still have amenity=kids_area as well (for
explicit mapping of the kids_area, inside the other feature).
I wouldn't add secondary criteria to the definition that is only sometimes
or "usually" true.

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141219/e9148e71/attachment.html>