[Tagging] Mapping of kids areas

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Fri Dec 19 13:05:38 UTC 2014


-1, there is no reason to tag two identical playgrounds (outdoor, standard
set of playground toys) differently just because one
is near mall and other not.

2014-12-19 13:59 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
> 2014-12-19 13:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>:
>>
>> I would prefer leisure=playground for standalone and kids_area=yes for an
>> additional feature. This seems intuitive to me.
>
>
>
> +1, I'd see it the same. We could still have amenity=kids_area as well
> (for explicit mapping of the kids_area, inside the other feature).
> I wouldn't add secondary criteria to the definition that is only sometimes
> or "usually" true.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141219/33625535/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list