[Tagging] DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Thu Dec 25 19:36:46 UTC 2014


I never understood the cycleway=opposite. I would really need a picture of
a situation where you need it.

IMHO you do not have to use this tag on a oneway street where cyclists can
drive in both directions, but on their own side. So I think your
requirement to always add it to a oneway street that allows cyclists in
both directions is wrong.

regards

m



On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Ulrich Lamm <ulamm.brem at t-online.de> wrote:

> Dear mapping and cycling friends
>
> as that article is in German, it is questionable, if the international
> mailig list is a good adress,
> but in German language, I've found only local mailing lists.
>
> As one can hear and read in discussions, and as is visible from the
> results of mapping, a lot of mappers know very little about the cycling
> facilities, they map.
>
> And the WIki in all, the German Wiki in special, is a bit labyrinthical.
> Several guidelines are not complete, some describe only one of the serious
> schemes or even suggest(ed) a scheme that can't be called serious.
>
> I've tried to accomplish and harmonize articles, but some people don't
> like that and reverted them.
>
> Now, as subpages of my user page, there are two more exact versions of
> "DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren":
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen
> kartieren/revision from 23 December 2014
> is an attempt of a comprehensive explanation of real cycling facilities
> and a comprehensive presentation of the tagging possibilities. On 25
> Dezember I've done some lesser revisions.
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen
> kartieren/approach from 24 December 2014
> explains the reality of cycling facilities, but on the guidelines only the
> biggest mistakes are corrected and only the biggest nonsens is deleted.
>
> Who refuses to a comprehensive presentation of reality and serious tagging
> schemes, has to accept the reproach to submit to ways of tagging that
> inhibit optimal routing and correct rendering.
>
> Merry Xmas,
> Ulrich
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20141225/df0997b9/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list