[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=fitness_centre
andig88 at t-online.de
Sun Dec 28 22:35:06 UTC 2014
> Water fountains, benches, parking, etc. aren't tagged any different just
> because they are located inside a sports centre.
But are people searching for that the same way? If I look for stuff like
that I'm probably somewhere outside and just look what's near me. Then I
probaby realize pretty fast if it is public or private.
Would you tag a sauna inside a sports/fitness centre with shop=sauna or
On the other hand if I look for a fitness centre I'm probably at home I
want to find one to work out and see what's available in the city, how
close it is, can I reach it with public transport, is there parking,
look up the website for pricing etc. And having all kind of "private"
gyms would not give a good overview.
> I like the original proposal leisure=fitness_centre. It would work no matter where it is located.
It certainly could, but then I would say we also need some kind of
subtag to indicate if you just sign up for a gym membership or if you
have to join some kind of larger sports club. Then do you tag this as
individual node in a sports centre?
fitness_centre:access=membership, fitness_centre:access=club? private?
Or have something like fitness_centre=yes? (Not sure as we already have
Honestly didn't think that much about this, because I just wanted a tag
in the first place ;D
More information about the Tagging