[Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment

Alex Rollin alex.rollin at gmail.com
Sun Feb 16 10:12:50 UTC 2014


bathtub
furnished

--
Alex


On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Dan S <danstowell+osm at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2014-02-16 8:29 GMT+00:00 Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk>:
> > On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:06 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> >> >I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments.
> >>
> >>
> >> I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more
> >> than one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only
> >> that there is at least one unit for rent on a short term basis.
> >> Therefore the plural designation might often be wrong while the
> >> singular will not.
> >>
> > +1
> > The plural also implies that all of the apartments in the building are
> > available for short term holiday rental, whereas in reality there is
> > likely to be a mix of rental and residential apartments in the building.
> >
> > Phil (trigpoint)
>
> FWIW, I too am happy with the singular tourism=apartment.
>
> I'll repeat what I said on the talk page: beds=* would be better as
> capacity=*. Otherwise, looks OK to me.
>
> Best
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140216/073c7f96/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list