[Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

[John Packer]

There is an interesting question on this tag's talk page:

> I think it collide with "building=industrial", "building=factory" and
> "landuse=industrial" and i propose to "delete" this Tag.
> Or why should we use this Tag?
> cptechnik - Peter Coenen - Windeck<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Cptechnik>(
> talk<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cptechnik&action=edit&redlink=1>)
> 22:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)



2014-02-25 13:36 GMT-03:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
>
> > Am 25/feb/2014 um 17:27 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer <
> dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Am 25/feb/2014 um 17:10 schrieb Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Why not. But what about this sentence : "landuse=industrial to show
> >> the area around the building. "  ?
> >
> >
> > IMHO the building should be included. There's no problem in tagging all
> areas that are industrially used with landuse=industrial, so my suggestion
> is to add landuse=industrial to works if it's missing.
>
>
> Another possible question is whether to add landuse=commercial to offices
> inside the plant, which I'd reply with not in general, maybe yes if it is a
> big and or fenced area of only offices that happens to be enclosed by the
> plant. If a producing /manufacturing company has an administrative site
> outside of producing facilities this would not be industrial of course.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140225/4e793b49/attachment-0001.html>