[Tagging] Pistemap proposal

[Janko Mihelić]

I have a few objections about that proposal:

landuse=winter_sports
I don't like this way of confining a ski resort. First,
landuse=winter_sports here is used to tag a ski resort. That can't be
right, because a restaurant can be a part of a ski resort, and it isn't
used for winter sports. Second, the areas are going to be arbitrary because
ski resorts don't have explicit borders as far as I know.

aerialway=mixed_lift
This value is a bit vague. How are you going to tag aerialway:occupancy of
both types of lifts? What if there is a mixed lift with chairs that have 4
seats and chairs that have 2 seats? I have a feeling only relations can tag
this right, but maybe there is a better solution.

Other than those, the proposal looks ok to me.

Janko



2014-02-25 20:58 GMT+01:00 yvecai <yvecai at gmail.com>:

> Is there any objection to move this page out of the Proposed features?
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste_Maps
>
> This is widely used, and the page is stable for long now. From time to
> time some opensnowmap.org users feels like they shouldn't use it because
> of its 'proposal' look on the wiki.
> Also, maybe a few changes could be proposed, but it would be easier to
> first settle this wiki page in the 'accepted' ones.
>
> If there is no objection, and someone knows how to do, please do.
> Yves
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140225/a7938c89/attachment.html>