[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bag shop, pet shop

[Janko Mihelić]

I think these two are pretty straightforward, no voting needed really.

Janko


2014/1/5 Peter Wendorff <wendorff at uni-paderborn.de>

> Hi Matthijs,
> I agree on your opinion, but I don't imply from that any automatic
> re-tagging.
>
> shop=bag is already documented in German [1] and Russion, the English
> page is empty yet unfortunately. But I don't think we need a proposal
> for that.
>
> shop=pet is documented as well, in English [2], Spanish, Japanese (?
> cannot read the page so don't know what exactly is written there),
> Portuguese and Russian.
>
> Forget the proposal and add the corresponding documentation if you want
> - just my few thoughts.
>
> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dbag
> [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpet
>
> regards
> Peter
>
> Am 01.01.2014 22:13, schrieb Matthijs Melissen:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Currently the tags shop=bag (303) and shop=pet (4501) are used in
> > parallel to the less used tags shop=bags (177) and shop=pets (137). I
> > propose to agree on the defacto standard (the singular).
> >
> > In order to accomplish that, I have created two proposal pages:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bag_shop
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pet_shop
> >
> > Please let me know what you think.
> >
> > With kind regards,
> > Matthijs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140105/4b86c55f/attachment-0001.html>