[Tagging] one-directinal bicycle dismount on oneway road ?

[Volker Schmidt]

I realize that we are back to the inconclusive discussion about the
distinction between no-bicycle at all and push-your-bike-by-hand.

I have no examples of ways where this distinction is relevant, but
certainly know nodes of that kind: on a normal pedestrian crossing (zebra
crossing ) in Italy you have to dismount from your bike and walk it across.
On a stile you have a physical impediment to get your bicycle across.

And I also realise that my issue is a problem of the renderer, and not of
the map, strictly speaking. The problem is real. Of the renderers for
bicycle that I use, all refuse to route through a one-way street in the
opposite direction.


On 19 January 2014 17:17, Georg Feddern <osm at bavarianmallet.de> wrote:

> Am 19.01.2014 12:06, schrieb Colin Smale:
>
>  In the UK there is a difference between "no cycles" and "no cycling".
>> Although in general you may be correct that a dismounted cyclist is
>> effectively a pedestrian, there are also footways (or whatever you want to
>> call them) signed as "no cycles", which means that in these cases a
>> dismounted cyclist is not equivalent to a pedestrian.
>>
>
> Yes, I had that in mind, but that was not the question here. ;-)
> (You get what you ask. ;-) )
>
>
>  If foot=yes (explicit or implied) implies bicycle=dismount which
>> corresponds to "no cycling", I would suggest that bicycle=no would then
>> mean "no cycles" i.e. not even if dismounted.
>>
>>
> Ouch - I won't mix this here.
> bicycle=no is long time used and defined as "traffic", as "use", not as
> "object".
> So "bicycle=no" means "no cycling" a long time already.
>
> For "no cycles" there should be a new tag.
> There was a discussion some time ago.
>
>
>  But watch out for talking about "what is legally allowed" as it varies
>> widely by country!
>>
>>
> Georg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140119/aa1f6e7c/attachment.html>