[Tagging] "Relations are not categories" excepted for "type=network" ?
Frank Little
frankosm at xs4all.nl
Wed Jul 16 17:08:53 UTC 2014
These are practices which a lot of people have been following for a long
time.
I do not see a real problem which you are trying to solve here.
Leave it alone, please.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
From: Pieren
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 6:46 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] "Relations are not categories" excepted for
"type=network" ?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm having a look at it. It could of course be converted automatically.
> Since I have the scripts to walk through the hierarchy already.
Again, I'm not asking to delete them *right now*. I'm checking if the
proposal is "fair" and is not breaking the "relations are not
categories" principle. If no, I could modify the wiki and recommend
some solutions (like using query the appropriate tags on the
collection itself instead of creating a relation for that). Existing
relations could be modified along the way when people are contribution
around them.
@Frank I agree that the wiki should formalize the practice but not all
practices in OSM have to be followed.
Pieren
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list