[Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Florian Schäfer florian at schaeferban.de
Tue Jul 22 15:28:09 UTC 2014

OK, I've just merged both pages into Key:min_age [1] and Key:max_age
[2],  added a note, describing why and translated both pages into
German. So for me the discussion is finished.
If anyone doesn't like, that it's now min_age instead of minage: Please
discuss it here or on the respective talk-page. I won't mind, if you
would move it to minage/maxage. My primary goal was to merge both into
one place.

Could anyone align the french translations [1] [2]? My French is too bad
for that.


[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:min_age
[2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:max_age
[3]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:minage
[4]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:maxage

Am 21.07.2014 01:24, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>> Am 19/lug/2014 um 21:12 schrieb John Packer <john.packer7 at gmail.com>:
>> It seems using minage "for usage" is not very different from admission in case of a playground.
>> In case of a school, it would be better to describe the school teaching level using isced:level=* or some country-specific tag.
> +1, don't see the need for two different tags. I'd use min_age
> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 884 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140722/1302243b/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Tagging mailing list