[Tagging] Reviewing the use of addr:housename
Fernando Trebien
fernando.trebien at gmail.com
Wed Jun 18 18:17:56 UTC 2014
Reading from the wiki: "This is sometimes used in some countries like
England instead of [1] (or in addition to [2]) a house number."
>From that, I originally understood that one would use housename:
[1] when a house number does not apply (when houses are identified by
names/non-numeric codes, not by pure numbers)
[2] as a generic field for additional addressing information (mostly
as a substitute to addr:door and addr:unit, which never really took
off despite being approved for 3 years now; this interpretation may be
incorrect though)
However, if you have a building (even building=house) with a name, you
would have building=*+name=[building name], right?
In Brazil some people have suggested that one would use addr:housename
for a building's name when the element which is a building is also an
amenity (e.g. building=yes+amenity=police), in which case the name tag
would refer to the amenity, not to the building. I don't think this is
the intended usage of name and addr:housename, but let me know if I'm
wrong.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Hain
<andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> The uses of the tag addr:housename in the database[1] does not match
> documentation[2] well. A high prroportion of uses are accidental; there were
> some bug reports[3][4] against iD, which used to have a housename box at the
> beginning of every point for entering addresses, pointing out doubtful use
> by new mappers. The top 100 values of the tag tell their own story.
>
> --
> Andrew
>
> [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr%3Ahousename#values
> [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
> [3] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/1525
> [4] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2124
>
> Bloc 1 265
> (empty string) 531
> 1 472
> bloc 385
> 2 379
> 3 373
> 4 335
> 5 293
> 6 279
> 7 269
> 9 263
> 8 258
> 10 240
> 12 224
> 11 211
> edificio 209
> Mairie 206
> 16 202
> 15 192
> 14 189
> 18 189
> s/n 184
> Edificio 179
> Heidehaus 168
> San Antonio II 164
> 17 164
> Taman Cantek 159
> Rathaus 159
> 20 155
> 19 152
> 13 146
> casă 146
> 22 143
> 21 139
> Berg Studentby 138
> 25 136
> 26 135
> 23 132
> Rose Cottage 130
> 24 129
> A 124
> 28 122
> Taman Ridgeview Phase 12 121
> The Cottage 121
> 27 118
> The Lodge 116
> B 111
> 31 103
> 29 100
> 32 99
> 30 98
> C 98
> Pfarrhaus 96
> Garages 95
> Arcaden 94
> Haus 1 94
> 33 91
> Nöhren Hof 89
> The Bungalow 88
> 36 88
> Edificio␣ 88
> Haus 2 88
> Vestergård 87
> Casă 86
> Lidl 84
> 34 84
> 35 84
> D 84
> Østergård 83
> 40 80
> 38 77
> Ældrecentret Kærgården 77
> Магазин 76
> C.C. Condado Shopping 75
> 37 74
> CSI Warehouse 73
> Bahnhof 73
> 42 71
> 44 71
> Березники 71
> 39 70
> 45 70
> The Coach House 70
> 41 69
> Stevnshøj 69
> Gemeindehaus 68
> E 68
> McDonald's 68
> Golden Haven Memorial Park 66
> Gemeindeamt 65
> Unit 1 65
> 43 64
> Højgård 64
> The Vicarage 63
> Makado 63
> 46 62
> Top Center 62
> Netto 62
> Møllebækkollegiet 61
> Garage 61
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409
"Nullius in verba."
More information about the Tagging
mailing list