[Tagging] Reviewing the use of addr:housename
Serge Wroclawski
emacsen at gmail.com
Wed Jun 18 19:15:44 UTC 2014
I think there's an excellent point which is being danced around, which
is that there's a conflation between a building's name and the
addr:housename.
Perhaps there's a call for a building name tag which may or may not be
the addr:housename tag?
- Serge
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Fernando Trebien
<fernando.trebien at gmail.com> wrote:
> Reading from the wiki: "This is sometimes used in some countries like
> England instead of [1] (or in addition to [2]) a house number."
>
> From that, I originally understood that one would use housename:
> [1] when a house number does not apply (when houses are identified by
> names/non-numeric codes, not by pure numbers)
> [2] as a generic field for additional addressing information (mostly
> as a substitute to addr:door and addr:unit, which never really took
> off despite being approved for 3 years now; this interpretation may be
> incorrect though)
>
> However, if you have a building (even building=house) with a name, you
> would have building=*+name=[building name], right?
>
> In Brazil some people have suggested that one would use addr:housename
> for a building's name when the element which is a building is also an
> amenity (e.g. building=yes+amenity=police), in which case the name tag
> would refer to the amenity, not to the building. I don't think this is
> the intended usage of name and addr:housename, but let me know if I'm
> wrong.
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Hain
> <andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>> The uses of the tag addr:housename in the database[1] does not match
>> documentation[2] well. A high prroportion of uses are accidental; there were
>> some bug reports[3][4] against iD, which used to have a housename box at the
>> beginning of every point for entering addresses, pointing out doubtful use
>> by new mappers. The top 100 values of the tag tell their own story.
>>
>> --
>> Andrew
>>
>> [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr%3Ahousename#values
>> [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
>> [3] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/1525
>> [4] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2124
>>
>> Bloc 1 265
>> (empty string) 531
>> 1 472
>> bloc 385
>> 2 379
>> 3 373
>> 4 335
>> 5 293
>> 6 279
>> 7 269
>> 9 263
>> 8 258
>> 10 240
>> 12 224
>> 11 211
>> edificio 209
>> Mairie 206
>> 16 202
>> 15 192
>> 14 189
>> 18 189
>> s/n 184
>> Edificio 179
>> Heidehaus 168
>> San Antonio II 164
>> 17 164
>> Taman Cantek 159
>> Rathaus 159
>> 20 155
>> 19 152
>> 13 146
>> casă 146
>> 22 143
>> 21 139
>> Berg Studentby 138
>> 25 136
>> 26 135
>> 23 132
>> Rose Cottage 130
>> 24 129
>> A 124
>> 28 122
>> Taman Ridgeview Phase 12 121
>> The Cottage 121
>> 27 118
>> The Lodge 116
>> B 111
>> 31 103
>> 29 100
>> 32 99
>> 30 98
>> C 98
>> Pfarrhaus 96
>> Garages 95
>> Arcaden 94
>> Haus 1 94
>> 33 91
>> Nöhren Hof 89
>> The Bungalow 88
>> 36 88
>> Edificio␣ 88
>> Haus 2 88
>> Vestergård 87
>> Casă 86
>> Lidl 84
>> 34 84
>> 35 84
>> D 84
>> Østergård 83
>> 40 80
>> 38 77
>> Ældrecentret Kærgården 77
>> Магазин 76
>> C.C. Condado Shopping 75
>> 37 74
>> CSI Warehouse 73
>> Bahnhof 73
>> 42 71
>> 44 71
>> Березники 71
>> 39 70
>> 45 70
>> The Coach House 70
>> 41 69
>> Stevnshøj 69
>> Gemeindehaus 68
>> E 68
>> McDonald's 68
>> Golden Haven Memorial Park 66
>> Gemeindeamt 65
>> Unit 1 65
>> 43 64
>> Højgård 64
>> The Vicarage 63
>> Makado 63
>> 46 62
>> Top Center 62
>> Netto 62
>> Møllebækkollegiet 61
>> Garage 61
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Trebien
> +55 (51) 9962-5409
>
> "Nullius in verba."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list