[Tagging] Fireplace, Fire Pit, BBQ Grill

Andreas Goss andig88 at t-online.de
Mon Jun 23 16:43:33 UTC 2014


> Rather than introducing other tags, would it be better to just better
> define and document what firepit should be used for?

Probably the best idea. The way I see it is that the main information 
people would be interested in if they can make BBQ there (and maybe 
heating). Then it would also be great to be able to combine it with 
tourism=picnic_site and tourism=camp_site. Maybe the solution for that 
is simply to use bbq=yes

amenity=fire_pit (we decide that it either implies bbq=yes or no and 
then you can use bbq=* if it doesn't)

amenity=bbq_grill

Do we want to be able to disinguish between a fire_pit and bbq_grill 
when tagging it on a tourism=camp_sit tag? Or would be bbq=yes be 
enough... thinking about it now it actually sounds like "bqq allowed".

Maybe use bbq=yes/no/fire_pit/grill/forbidden/permitted/official on 
those on tourism tags?

And are we actually interested in fireplace=yes? I found some 
heating=fireplace wouldn't that make more sense?

__________
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎




More information about the Tagging mailing list